RobotTaco Feeling Awesome Yet?
Sign-Up Date : 2009-08-09 Posts : 237 Age : 31 Location : Cottage Grove, Minnesota
| Subject: Essay on Hannibal Barca Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:08 pm | |
| I wrote this for fun one day. I was gonna use it for college and whatnot. I'm not sure how it is though. Check it out for me.
Hannibal Barca was a general for the Carthaginian Empire during the Second Century B.C. Few generals rank as high, and none higher, then this great man. He is in my opinion the greatest general of all time. I have many reasons for making this claim. He was feared by his enemies, he was undefeatable even without help, his men loved him, he was a great politician, his personal characteristics were great, and his ability to innovate was the greatest of his time; Hannibal was defeated using his Hannibal's tactics.
See, for some 16-17 long years he terrorized the Roman peoples to the extent that even up until the Fall of the Western Roman Empire, Roman parents would invoke his name to scare their children into behaving. There is nothing more bad ass then being the Bogeyman. Hell, the Romans who usually didn't afraid of anything, would not go into combat with him. They were wetting themselves over him. Even after he was defeated and returned to his native Africa the Romans still were afraid. They hunted him down, even when he was an old man walking with a cane. He was just that intimidating to them.
Add to that, he kicked Roman asses for half a generation without any reinforcements at all. The army he had entering Italy was the same one he had leaving Italy. And he still pwned. Even with his soldiers starving, crying for home, and upset at the lack of success, Hannibal was still untouchable. Ticinus, Trebbia, Cannae, etc. He did these all after losing what was at least one-quarter of his army after crossing the Alps.
Another big thing: He was great at keeping his units loyal to him. Only once did any one desert, and this was a very small amount, and even then this was before they entered Italy. Do note, he was leading an army with people from many different cultures and who could not even speak each others languages. You had Celts, Gauls, Italians, Numidians, Phoenicians, Iberians, Libyans, etc, not to mention his own native Carthaginian officers. This was a very mixed army. The fact that they never abandoned him shows just how much they loved their general.
My fourth reason: He was a great politician while also being a great general. After the end of the Second Punic War, Hannibal was left without an army. So he ran for the office of Suffet, which is equivalent to being President of the United States. He was elected without any competition at all; the election was a landslide victory for him. Now, at this point, the office of Suffet had been robbed of most of it's power. Hannibal was able to restore it's power through his amazing sense of guile. After doing all this, he restored the treasury of the ailing Carthage to a manageable level in only a few years time and was able to set them up on the path to power before he was forcefully exiled by the Romans. It takes a great man to be able to conquer the battlefields of both Politics and the Military; Hannibal was just this kind of man.
An attribute that must also be discussed is his personality. Determination is a trait that would describe this man more than any other. Not once did he even think about giving up, even when the odds were obviously against him, with Hannibal only leaving Italy after being forced back by the Carthaginian government. His sense of chivalry is also a trait worth looking at. Every source we have on Hannibal comes from a Roman making every source on Hannibal severely biased against him and yet if one reads between the lines it is easy to see that Hannibal was a man of great honour. After the Battle of the Cannae, he gave the enemy general a proper cremation and sent the ashes to his fallen foe's family and after the Battle of Lake Trasimene he attempted to give his enemy a proper burial and gave up looking for the body after hours of strenuously looking for it. Despite being a man with enough blood on his hands to fill up 10 Olympic-sized pools, he was also a great family man; his sense of filial piety is worthy of note. Having sworn an oath to his father at the age of nine to never give Rome a moment's rest, he carried through with it even after his father's untimely death. He was also deeply saddened upon seeing his brother Hasdrubal's severed head and was depressed for many days after wards.
My final reason is that Hannibal was vastly innovative. He was a pioneer in combining infantry and cavalry into one cohesive army. Before his time, most armies were heavily biased towards infantry or cavalry, with only Phillip, Alexander and his own father, Hamilcar, before him having tried combining the two. Hannibal was the one who mastered this art and Hannibal achieved great success because of it. Hannibal also introduced the double envelopment and was also the only general ever to successfully implement it. Using this on the field of Cannae, Hannibal was able to defeat an army almost twice as big as his own. He also invented biological warfare; while in charge of a fleet during his exile, he instructed his men to throw jars filled with snakes at the enemy ships. Hannibal won the battle without contest. Hannibal's changes to the way war was waged were so effective, it is his own tactics that ultimately brought an end to his career. It is only right to call him "The Father of Strategy".
In conclusion, Hannibal was a man of many great traits. His only weakness was his terrible sense of luck. Luck was on the Roman's side time and time again and despite this Hannibal was able to prove his worth as a general. Hannibal lost against all odds and that really has to say something about his worth as a gambler. Hannibal was more feared then Genghis Khan, indefatigable even without assistance, idolized by his men, renowned as a politician, and a genius in the art of inventing ways to kick his opponents ass. Without a doubt, Hannibal is the greatest general of all time and will be remembered by historians thousands of years from now. | |
|